4.6.2022: Environmental damage is a problem in most countries. What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility?
The degradation of the environment has become a serious worldwide problem that needs urgent action to be addressed. I believe that two factors attributing to this issue are the clearing of forests and the poisonous water. Therefore, both authorities and individuals should take responsibility to solve this issue.
There are two main factors behind this phenomenon. First of all, it relates to deforestation due to overpopulation, when people need more land to live in and more food to survive. Humans destroy the natural habitat and clear ground for accommodation and intensive farming, which requires chemical pesticides on plants, and antibiotics for livestock. As a result, land has become spent and infertile leading to a massive loss of vegetative cover and trees and the frequent occurrence of natural disasters, which creates an imbalance in the whole ecosystem. Furthermore, contaminated water which has not undergone proper treatment methods and is directly released into the lake, or ocean contributes to water pollution and is harmful to marine creatures.
Both authorities and individuals are accountable for the issue of environmental damage. Government should enact new international laws in which all citizens must obey all regulations in protecting the environment. Moreover, individuals are responsible for not doing harm to the environment in his or her daily performance. Therefore, the total amount of this substance disposed to the environment would significantly
plummet. For instance, they reduce the usage of personal vehicles as much as possible, or using organic pesticides and fertilizers are very helpful for environmental protection.
In conclusion, environmental damage is the disadvantageous impact of polluted water and deforestation; therefore, there is a call for responsibility of both governments and individuals in tackling this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | đam kim doan | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ttltpttdc | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-13 | Kaito Mori | 11 | view |
- With deforestation urban development and illegal hunting many species are becoming endangered as they lose their habitat and some are even threatened to the point of extinction Do you thibk it is important to protect animals What measures can be taken to 78
- 2 7 2022 Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time Is this a positive or negative development 78
- the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 61
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the stone age One was made 1 4 million years ago and the other was made 800 thousand years ago viewing from the back view front view and side view Summarize the information by selecting and repor 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to the environment would significantly plummet. For instance, they reduce the u...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71785714286 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38904108706 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0826997128 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160861532379 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542698366922 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512156974795 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981260867635 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662689865065 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.