ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE IS A PROBLEM IN MOST COUNTRIES. WHAT FACTORS DAMAGE THE ENVIRONMENT AND WHO SHOULD TAKE RESPONSIBILITY?
It is acknowledged that damaging the environment is problematic in many corners over the globe can face these issues. In the essay, I will elaborate on what are the factors which are damaging to the environment of the countries, and who will assume to tackle these problems.
There are myriad factors that many countries are suffering from environmental damage, the most significant of which are developing concrete jungles in the city and demanding for using energy. With regard to the first point, a number of industries are cutting thousands of trees per year to serve construction buildings. For example, the major cities have been erecting many centers and more facilities for the demands of citizens. Moreover, the investors are wasting plenty of money to build the blocks of the tower building with the aim of attracting tourists. As far as the second point is concerned, there are many vehicles used in the cities leading to the effect on the environment. For instance, in HCM city which is the largest people use motorbikes to work every single day. Therefore, tons of CO2 are exhausted by motorbikes per year, which makes the environment more and more serious.
The authorities and individual levels are proactively responsible for the environment to alleviate such issues, associated with encouraging for using recyclable materials and messaging for a protective environment. In terms of the former, the government should be enacted a law for citizens to use recycling bags, and products from recycling, which decrease the serious status of environmental damage. For example, the supermarket should be used recycling bags instead of plastic bags for users with the aim of decreasing the amount of refuse to the environment. When it comes to the latter, every individual can contribute a bit to the environment with many methods. For instance, teenagers can create groups that encourage everyone to give a hand for maintaining the existence of fresh air. Thus, the significance of responsibility at individual levels is a crucial task for the environment.
In conclusion, although the damage to the environment is alarming in many continents, the responsibility of the government and individuals can mitigate such problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | đam kim doan | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ttltpttdc | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-13 | Kaito Mori | 11 | view |
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 67
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in five countries in 2001 73
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet and they can study just as well as home to what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- These days an increasing number of people in many cities know little about their neighbors and does not have a sense of community What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest 78
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 794, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kes to work every single day. Therefore, tons of CO2 are exhausted by motorbikes ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06823078106 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518207282913 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8783600532 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201986457073 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671873700246 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679463199797 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145561199626 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707876051951 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 794, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kes to work every single day. Therefore, tons of CO2 are exhausted by motorbikes ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06823078106 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518207282913 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8783600532 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201986457073 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671873700246 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679463199797 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145561199626 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707876051951 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.