Admittedly, it is often argued that increasing the severity of penalties will cause most drivers to conform with traffic laws
People generally have opposing views about whether the government should administer strict punishments for traffic offences. There is a perception that this is the most workable measure to make roads less hazardous. However, I do not completely agree with this statement and believe that a range of other methods can be implemented together to foster careful driving.
Admittedly, it is often argued that increasing the severity of penalties will cause most drivers to conform with traffic laws. This argument emphasizes that severe punishments such as heavy fines, indefinite license suspension or even long prison sentences will undoubtedly make drivers to hesitate for a few seconds before breaking any traffic regulation. One typical example is Canada, which is almost always among the countries with the smallest number of motor vehicle fatalities. It is widely acknowledged that rigorous penalties are the key contributor to such an impressive outcome since reckless drivers here could receive the traffic ticket of up to several thousand dollars for speeding.
Nevertheless, I side with those who contend that safe driving routines can be formed in various ways without punishing traffic offenders by means of severe penalties such as imprisonment. One principal method is to educate people properly in driving schools and educational institutions before they drive in traffic. Furthermore, the government could allocate more funding to the Ministry of Transport for them to construct new public transport systems, thereby diminishing the number of private vehicles on roads and traffic accidents as well. There is little room for doubt that a flexible combination of such approaches is of paramount importance to dealing with this issue.
In conclusion, although it is suggested that imposing strict punishments will be more effective than other measures in reducing the number of traffic offenders and collisions on the road, I believe that it does not always generate the desired outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-19 | hungnguyen123 | 92 | view |
- The diagram below shows changes of a cinema from 1980 until now Summarize the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- contention is well grounded and it is necessary to analyze the driving force behind this predisposition 84
- Overall it can be seen clearly that the proportion of learners who studied took attended evening classes was higher than that of online and overseas students 67
- I disagree with this viewpoint and believe that the imposition of taxes on imported food is of paramount importance to the agricultural sector of a country 84
- As a result many believe camera surveillance is inadvisable and privacy is one of the most important rights which must be respected in this civilised world 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, nevertheless, second, so, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54397394137 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86887297612 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618892508143 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9288037907 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.833333333 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30263197593 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118834635848 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194459395072 0.0667982634062 291% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158168393342 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141850926478 0.056905535591 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.