After making a presentation in class, you want to evaluate it. Which of the following do you think would be better for you?
1. Watch the recording by yourself
2. Invite other attenders to discuss and give opinions.
Some times, in the classes, the majority of students have a presentation in the class, which is needed evaluated by someone expert or be a professor at the university. It is essential that this evaluation occurs through a procedure like inviting more teachers and professors for it, which can be beneficial form two aspects as personal characteristics and background knowledge. This essay attends to examine these two types of perspectives.
In the first step, it seems that attending the professors and experts can help asset the student’s presentation from personal attitudes which can exert a significant impact on students. In the way of explanation, experts and teachers claim that communication skills one of the primary critical elements for the student that can be considered by a student. However, this issue can be achieved by practice more in front of the mirror. Besides, there is an essential factor that never has ignored how the information transfer to the audience. Particularly, in a group of students, the brochure is a vital way to affect more on audiences. Nonetheless, by arguing between student and professor can be asserted that what sort of skills are crucial for the student. Consequently, a union of individuals is valuable to help understand the shortage of presentations in the university which is needed to develop more by the student.
From an academic point of view, the individuals who have selected as a lecturer should have extensive background knowledge in front of audiences. The professor should consider this issue at the end of the presentation. To illustrate, a group of professors and supervisors should attend the defense season of the student in the master or Ph.D. program. They adopt a heavy burden in the knowledgable context for evaluation students. Although, the student should be ready for this situation, which motivates them to study more when facing experts in this session. Primarily, it is a trend between girl students at the university. For instance, a few students in Iran have a little stress in the presentation time. Moreover, they have faced the majority of problems like missing information during the presentation. To sum up, participating in teacher and experts can help to asset the student from scientific vision.
Additionally, one of the ways which are helped the student to correct and evaluate themselves is recording the voice and video during their speech. Besides, the repetition of playing the video or sound is very easier than attending individuals to asset the student. On fact behind this act is that self-correction can count on the path of developing and learning the speech and presentation. But, it has more lack of openion of the expert. Moreover, participating in the community of individuals for evaluation goals can play a vital role in developing personal and knowledge skills.
In conclusion, from my point of view, it is necessary to discuss with the student, teacher, and professor to evaluate the presentation in two platforms discussed in the essay, and it can help to make progress the vital skills in the crucial frame.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-27 | amirgha67 | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-27 | farzaneheb7611 | 73 | view |
- After making a presentation in class you want to evaluate it Which of the following do you think would be better for you 1 Watch the recording by yourself 2 Invite other attenders to discuss and give opinions 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Company should pay for employees to get university degree 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should relax with the ways related to their hobbies and physical activities which are different with their work 73
- Now children do not behavior as well as the children did in the past Which one of the following measure do you think can help children age 5 10 behave better A Control the time they spend on TV or movie B Take more time to chat with children C Monitor the 73
- Some people believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving more than other buildings What type of old buildings are worth preserving Do the advantages of preserving these buildings outweigh the disadvantages 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needed evaluated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'evaluating' or 'to be evaluated'.
Suggestion: evaluating; to be evaluated
...sentation in the class, which is needed evaluated by someone expert or be a professor at ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...tudents, the brochure is a vital way to affect more on audiences. Nonetheless, by arguing b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 41.998997996 190% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2622.0 1615.20841683 162% => OK
No of words: 506.0 315.596192385 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08655921489 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450592885375 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 806.4 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9875983979 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.88 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.24 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121106620764 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378397794249 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356159614064 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871716950987 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315081828641 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.