1-After making a presentation in class, you want to evaluate it. Which of the following do you think would be better for you?
1-watch the recording by yourself
2-invite other attenders to discuss and give opinions
Nowadays in academic world, presentations become a vital part of education in classes from middle school to graduate studies at universities. A successfully and skillfully done presentation influences both scores of a student and his/her status in eyes of teachers and professors. Presentation is not an inborn or inherent skill but it is learned and can be further developed. There are several ways to improve the quality of presentation which will be so advantageous in later stages of both academic and career life.
According to me one of the strategies to improve the quality of presentation is to discuss the weaknesses and strengths of your presentation with attenders who were present in your presentation section. First of all they are better acquainted with the shortcomings of your presentation since they had the opportunity to observe you carefully and notice the weakness and strengths. While giving a lecture and presenting a specific topic, the person is deeply engaged with management of time and transferring information that can hardly notice the faults made in pronunciation, grammar or intonation. Besides the person is unaware of his/her body movements and the way makes eye-contact with audience. A participant will provide a greater inside about the presenter’s mistakes in language and delivery of presentation.
Furthermore after discovering the weaknesses, Presenter should look for possible solutions for improvement of such errors and faults. Having discussion over the problems with attenders provide an opportunity for the individual to better find solutions and develop strategies for improvement. A group of attenders ,who had the opportunity to observe the presenter carefully, have different backgrounds of knowledge and certain degrees of creativity. Hence, the presenter will have the chance to hear their new and creative solutions that he/she otherwise would not be able to reach.
Consequently, group thinking and discussion with attenders over evaluation of the quality a presentation seems extremely beneficial. Since they can not only give better insights into the nature of presenter’s weaknesses and faults but also they can provide better and more creative solutions and suggestions for improvement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-27 | amirgha67 | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-27 | farzaneheb7611 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than doing what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should relax with the ways related to their hobbies and physical activities which are different with their work 73
- Homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last year that region experienced twenty days with below average temperatures and local weather forecasters throughout the 58
- 1 After making a presentation in class you want to evaluate it Which of the following do you think would be better for you 1 watch the recording by yourself 2 invite other attenders to discuss and give opinions 73
- Now children do not behavior as well as the children did in the past Which one of the following measure do you think can help children age 5 10 behave better A Control the time they spend on TV or movie B Take more time to chat with children C Monitor the 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 520, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...tages of both academic and career life. According to me one of the strategies to improve the qu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...language and delivery of presentation. Furthermore after discovering the weaknesses, Prese...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es for improvement. A group of attenders ,who had the opportunity to observe the p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58771929825 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23622396988 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546783625731 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2796343816 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.4 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228630143457 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721823191842 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361192759711 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133155401265 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250731235202 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.