Translating devices have been promoted significantly nowadays due to the needs of traveling or living abroad. Given the undeniable convenience of these aids, taking a new language apart from the native one remains indispensable. I agree with this perspective.
In the automatical era, machines are perfect assistance to simplify our life. Nevertheless, there are aspects that only humans can manage. Mastering a new language allows learners to access several global working opportunities. Translating software is merely effective under the circumstances of brief conversations. As for formal and specialized ones, they are considered useless. For instance, how could someone get accepted into an international university without influent by the required language? If they do, will translation software manage to support you in lectures?
Moreover, learning a new language is analogous to widening your knowledge. According to a survey conducted by Seoul university, those who are bilingual or multilingual showed an effective response to tasks that required quick thinking compared to those who only know their mother tongue. Since the multilingual mind is able in comprehending multiple tongues, they can versatilely switch between languages which would facilitate their brain development. On account of unpredictable situations, preparing yourself ahead would save your life one day. For example, when visiting some country that you have no idea about its languages, even some isolated words, suddenly your phone or translating device is stolen or the battery goes off, how could you seek help? Multiple cases of tourists stranded in Vietnam due to the lack of words. These are the rationales that prove my agreement.
In conclusion, subjectively learning a language would bring numerous benefits to your career as well as your life. Relying on modern devices should be momentary.
- The diagram below shows the plan of a medical centre in 2008 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 67
- Nowadays artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars Why is this happening Is it positive or negative development 61
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsable. I agree with this perspective. In the automatical era, machines are per...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are manage to support you in lectures? Moreover, learning a new language is ana...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e rationales that prove my agreement. In conclusion, subjectively learning a l...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, apart from, as for, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64084507042 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08616265298 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69014084507 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2421232645 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3157894737 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9473684211 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173951767202 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459929748313 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494820213062 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978976872119 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306490392531 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.84 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.