An American film actor once said: “Tomorrow is important and precious”. Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether living for the moment or preparing for the future remains a heated debate. In my opinion, either present days or the upcoming time is of paramount importance, so individuals and communities should focus on both.
On the one hand, it goes without saying that the present plays a crucial role in daily lives. In terms of individuals, as an old saying “ Prevention is better than cure”, paying attention to health for the moment in time is the key to fight back serious medical conditions. According to World Health Organization, taking 10000 steps a day as well as doing a plenty of exercise on a regular basis not only relieve stress levels but also reduce the risk of high blood pressure or stroke. This directly suggests that boosting the wellbeing now is likely to extend life expectancy in the future. In terms of the society, failing to address the environmental problems for the time being poses a great threat to the ecological balance. To be more specific, widespread deforestation and exponential population growth are exerting severe pressure on finite sources that may come at the expense of the pristine environment. If the governments did not take immediate action to tackle environmental depletion, the worst-case scenario, which is mass erosion, could be expected.
On the other hand, it is a foregone conclusion that the future deserves undivided attention from inhabitants. In other words, the future is unforeseeable, so nations would better be well-prepared for the doom days, or else mass fatalities would be on the cards. A case in point is America, a country which failed to keep the stockpile of medical devices beforehand and is ramping up in the death toll due to the shortage of ventilators in the midst of corona virus pandemic. What can be inferred from this is preparing for the future is integral to the sustainability of life.
In conclusion, future plans ensure that people can live their life to the fullest, but enjoying life for the time being do wonders for the wellbeing of individuals and nature. Therefore, laying stress on the future or the present is both worthwhile, so citizens should adjust to live for both.
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted Do you agree or disagree 73
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicine To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Is it better to be unemployed in jobs rather than to be employed in jobs even if they don t feel happy or enjoy Do you agree or disagree 89
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicine To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and communities should focus on both. On the one hand, it goes without saying ...
^^^
Line 4, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nvironmental problems for the time being poses a great threat to the ecological b...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch is mass erosion, could be expected. On the other hand, it is a foregone conc...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntegral to the sustainability of life. In conclusion, future plans ensure that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99173553719 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87489554571 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567493112948 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9371333741 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116703236855 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385502385918 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344480883737 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769369370699 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249133392051 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.