Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government. Do you agree or disagree?
Concerns have been raised whether the exchange of commodities on a global scale should be regulated or not. Though uncontrolled trading could enhance political friendship between nations and supply citizens with a wide range of options, this predisposition could have a dire impact on society and individuals. This essay will elucidate the provided problem.
There are multitudinous benefits which a free commercial market could offer. Initially, as soon as this policy is enacted, its impact on bridging the gap, or discriminations between counterparts could be clearly observed. To be specific, collaboration may be strengthened owing to cross-border laws, which symbolize the trust in their partnerships as the authorities allow them to sell goods without being censored. The second point of view relates to an array of commodity choices inhabitants can make. If high quality products are engaged in the trading process, consumers are entitled to better their living conditions with an affordable price.
Despite previous opportunities, more drawbacks could be escalated when international trading is proliferating without regulation. Primarily, besides high-end commodities manufactured by reliable firms, a variety of unknown brands attempt to sell their substandard products in an illegal way. This may lead to adverse health illnesses for people making a payment for these options, together with propagating a false belief that all foreign goods are low quality in use. Furthermore, this tendency could lead to the bankruptcy of local businesses since people may prioritize making use of reputational brand names rather than native ones.
To conclude, the uncensored policy of exporting goods to other regions has gained popularity recently, though this could have both merits and demerits in equal measures.
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 89
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 11
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife animals while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 11
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife animals while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 11
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 274, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an illegal way" with adverb for "illegal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...empt to sell their substandard products in an illegal way. This may lead to adverse health illnes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, may, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72426470588 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07895796631 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672794117647 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2303767644 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.769230769 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101278895172 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336524284595 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443152416522 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605102611415 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221552397971 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.