Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government. Do you agree or disagree?
The rapid growth of globalization has enabled countries to trade goods with unprecedented ease, speed, and convenience. While many believe that regulations should be imposed on such international transactions to ensure order, others beg to differ, advocating the introduction of free trade. Personally, I side with the former view as a legally restricted trading market could guarantee social orders and national security.
Firstly, countries could benefit from a socially organized community thanks to commercial restrictions. On imposing appropriate tariffs, taxes and legislations, the flow of goods and their prices would be sufficiently controlled, thus generating a fair and disciplined trading area. Moreover, close examination would ensure that the contents of goods sold are globally acceptable and legal, which in turn could reduce the illegal sales of black market commodities.
Additionally, governmental restrictions on trading will serve to consolidate protection for national defense industries. With rules imposed on transactions, businesses that play significant roles in safeguarding their nations will receive high levels of protection. This would lead to a reinforcement in countries’ and citizens’ safety. For instance, a nation may implement tariffs on international competition to secure domestic production of military technology and related goods.
In conclusion, restricting goods sales generates a variety of benefits in both social and national terms. However, it is worth taking into account the benefits of a free trade market so that governments can integrate the best of both worlds into their policies. Only in this way could we hope for an ideal development in the international logistics industry.
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 84
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 89
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife animals while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extent do you agree 56
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90909090909 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29785469422 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664031620553 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.039731252 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138215665676 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491970231694 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382523177651 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815405181949 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330119676549 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.