Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that government should give organizations and producers unlimited authority to export goods to other nations. Personally, for the most part, I agree with this statement although there are cases when this could be wrong.
First and foremost, foreign trade brings about enormous financial resources, especially to developing countries like Vietnam. In other words, by selling goods abroad, a nation could utilise many of its plentiful resources which are valuable in other countries, therefore, creating noticeable income sources. For instance, in Vietnam, the Basa fish lives in large quantities but is undermined by the locals. However, when exporting this fish species to the US, it soon turned out to be a good deal as the US people found it to taste good. Secondly, conducting transactions with foreign importers is also an incentive for domestic producers to improve their goods to meet international standards. The exporting of Bac Giang lychee to Japan is a telling example of this since the indigenous farmers have applied Vietgap criteria to create not only delicious but also safe-and-healthy-to-eat fruit, which they have never done before. Moreover, by selling goods to other territories, domestic firms could bring about a source of foreign currency, which is extremely important when exchanging essential goods like oil or gases as these types of goods nearly have to be sold and purchased in the US dollar.
On the other hand, in some circumstances, exporting goods should be put under the government’s control, namely, the economic crisis, the food crisis and more recently, the medical crisis. In these cases, necessary products such as face masks need to be kept in the country to avoid social unrest. Take Covid-19 as an example, when this epidemic spread widely in Vietnam, some face-mask-manufacturing companies exported these goods to other countries which offered higher prices than the domestic market, thus causing a medical items shortage among people and many sellers even worsening the situation by pushing the price to an unaffordable cost.
In conclusion, there are various benefits that a nation could have if the government apply no restriction to selling goods abroad, however, sometimes, control and legislation are still required to keep the national market functioning properly.
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 73
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 74
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be sold and purchased in the US dollar. On the other hand, in some circumstances...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'items'' or 'item's'?
Suggestion: items'; item's
...domestic market, thus causing a medical items shortage among people and many sellers ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4478021978 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03188560709 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612637362637 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8904503449 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.538461538 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23871167038 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814654189714 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472077058449 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141577321054 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235554769907 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.