Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society?
These days, cell phone abuse has gained in popularity in the majority of workers, especially in the young adults. Although receiving phone calls all the time can help people to keep track of their issues, in the long run, this habit appears as a negative reverse in individuals as well as the whole society.
Apparently, overusing phones either in the workplace or outside could result in a diminish in individual physical and mental condition. Firstly, responding to the phone calls during working hours can make workers loose their concentration on work, thereby reducing working productivity. Moreover, if a worker was informed some personal issues, they would seem to partially worry about that stuff rather than focusing on work. Secondly, if using phone 24/7 turns out to be the daily habits, the feeling of holding phone can become human psychological safe condition. Particularly, people could feel frustrated or stressful whenever it comes to the situation that they cannot use their gadgets.
In terms of the whole society, using phone on a daily basis may damage human health and social behaviors in the long progress. First and foremost, because of phone addiction, people can weaken their social bonds in real life. In reality, it is common to see the scenario in which people hang out together but everyone is occupied with their personal interaction in social networks. This behavior can abandon human relationships, which later leads to antisocial behaviors such as isolation. Besides, since human brain system is vulnerable to the wave from electronic gadgets, it would be a torture for our mental system if we kept using them without moderation.
In conclusion, overusing mobile phone is likely to do more harm than good to individual lives and human in general. While it can damage our working ability and cognitive capacity in the short run, in longer progress, the whole society can seriously suffer from cell phones addiction and brain damages.
- Line graph 11
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 95
- Each year the crime rate increases What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity 96
- Visitor spend every year from 1996 to 2014 by tourist in 5 countries including Australia USA UK Japan and China Units are measured in NZ 69
- The bar chart below shows Scotland’s to the rest of the UK and the rest of the world for the year 2014. Summarize the information and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he workplace or outside could result in a diminish in individual physical and mental condi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...s during working hours can make workers loose their concentration on work, thereby re...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ell phones addiction and brain damages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, in general, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66650124125 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601880877743 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6209769441 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.071428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228045691097 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740974857238 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463608659847 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141325717423 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342404077116 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.