The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There have been an increasing number of private vechiles in all around the world, contributing to problem of traffic congestion. Although some support the idea that governments should spend national budget to provide free public transport that available anytime, this not a best way to address the problem.
The first reason is that demand for having private vechiles is till growing, even public transport is free. First, since public transportation systems in many countries, especially undeveloped ones are not reliable, citizens in those countries are more likely to choose private vechiles, which saving them a large amount of effort. For example, in order to avoiding the risk of experiencing either train systems run out of service suddenly or buses come late, they decide to drive on their own, which ensures their punctruality. Second, the public transport, such as buses and trains in some places are not designed conveniently for commuters. In fact, since some bus stops are too far away from their houses, taking them a great amount of time to get there, they would have no choice but to drive, even if they dont want to.
It is also not ineffecient to provide mass transit freely at any time. First, as traffic jam usually takes place in rush hour period, mass transit only be the effective during this period by reducing the number of cars on road. Therefore, having countinuous public transit service is unneccessary. In addition, there would be waste of both money and resouces if this measure comes into play. In fact, if public transit was available 24/7, money and resources, such as engery and staff would be spent in order to keep the system running continously, even when there is an only one passenger is using.
In conclusion, provding public transport freely at any time is not a pratical solution for traffic congestion. Goverment should find other appoarches to address the this
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | phuongnguyen01 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | Manpreet aujla | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | PhuongLee | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | hongthuy | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-21 | Tran Xuan Quoc | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...nsport that available anytime, this not a best way to address the problem. The...
^
Line 3, column 813, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ve no choice but to drive, even if they dont want to. It is also not ineffecient ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e is an only one passenger is using. In conclusion, provding public transport f...
^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...should find other appoarches to address the this
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0664556962 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60892148573 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8764925973 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161865093221 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582853333336 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573935423157 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108456809738 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511705287683 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.