It has been observed that the immense and insane fuel consumption is the main cause of environmental disasters. A certain set of the population advocates that to deter the catastrophic calamities authorities need to increase the fule price. This essay will discuss why increasing the fuel rate is not the only solution to control such a situation. In my opinion ban on plastic, afforestation and awareness among the people are some other major factors, as well as people need some alternates of fuel to keep running their daily life.
To embark on, from decades scientists have shown apparent proofs about the devastating results of fossil fuel consumption on nature. For instance, depletion of polar regions, global warming, seasonal imbalance and adverse effect on our biological system. Increasing the rates on fule could only control a certain class of our society, however, big industries, machinery plants, and conventional motor vehicles still will work on natural fuels. Nonetheless, to suppress the scenario the government should provide a suitable alternative of this like public transport at a cheap rate so that people start to avoid their own cars on roads. Certainly, increasing fuel rates could only affect a specific number of people but do not resolve the actual issue.
On the other end of the spectrum, there are some other steps to control the problem like banning plastic on the ubiquitous manner, as it is a most lethal material which takes around thousand years to decompose. Secondly, the active involvement of citizens with councils to promote afforestation is one of the positive steps for environmental protection. According to an empirical survey conducted by London's Queens Unversity, around forty-seven percent of the land around to world needs actual care in terms of vegetation. Lastly, several awareness programs regarding the proper use of our natural resources and how individuals can contribute to saving the environment is a paramount need. Consequently, instead of increasing rates the government can invest their efforts on these solutions which are absolute essential activities.
In conclusion, fuel consumption on a large level around the globe is a major concern towards natural disasters. Although, by increasing price on fule we could only deter a certain part of the population, which is not an ultimate solution. Instead of this, the government can ban on plastic use, encourage people to participate in afforestation and providing knowledge about the proper use of natural resources are some imperative steps towards resolving environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...situation. In my opinion ban on plastic, afforestation and awareness among the pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, lastly, nonetheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40786240786 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97645540958 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565110565111 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2446142487 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.470588235 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9411764706 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136209568443 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044414687851 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312065850421 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854880234361 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237887947269 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.