The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The overconsumption of fossil fuel has become as a major topic of concern recently. Some people suggest that increasing the fuel price can be the solution to cope with the environmental issues. Personally, I believe that other measures should also be given equal consideration.
Firstly, increasing the fuel expense cannot minimise the global dependence on fuel. It should be first noted that even when the price of fuel increases significantly, people still cannot cut down the tremendous demand for petrol at once. For example, in daily life people still need to use their cars despite the fluctuation in petrol price. Another clear reason is that petrol is also intended for other applications in manufacturing industries and agricultural purposes. If the price of fuel increases, the national economy could suffer many unfavourable consequences.
When it comes to reducing the greenhouse gas emissions, some measures should be taken to mitigate the problems of overconsuming fuel. The most practical measure at the moment is to reduce the demand for resources in daily activities like traveling or production. This can be done by encouraging people to turn to mass-producing energy-efficient products like hybrid cars or implementing new saving energy technology in manufacture. Besides, the most sustainable solution is to lower the reliance on fuel by taking advantage of alternative resources. Wind and tidal power in the Netherlands, nuclear power in Japan and solar power in the United States have all proven their efficiency in energy in energy production. These could be employed in other parts of the world to minimise the global dependence on fossil fuel.
As all existing data above shows that the only cutting down the fuel price will not reduce the global warming effects. Some strong alternative measures need to be implemented to tackle this situation.
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and give an example to support your idea. 73
- is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and give an example to support your idea. 84
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 686, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in energy'.
Suggestion: in energy
...States have all proven their efficiency in energy in energy production. These could be employed in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... global dependence on fossil fuel. As all existing data above shows that the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, so, still, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39322033898 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05954691882 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562711864407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8421892099 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.4375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102700944568 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387901584275 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424746851301 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647064895727 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256678446309 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.