The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that increasing the price of petroleum products for all kinds of vehicles will be the best decision to solve the world's environmental problems. However, in my own opinion, this is not the best way to deal with the problem. It is just one of the ways to deal with them. Aside from that, increasing the price of fuel can bring more drawbacks.
On the one hand, increasing the cost of fuel is beneficial to some extent. The first benefit is reducing air pollution because people will use other kinds of transportation such as subways, public buses, etc. Private transport, such as motorbikes and cars, will no longer release exhaust fumes into the atmosphere that can cause air pollution. The next benefit is reducing traffic congestion. Traffic jams always happen, especially at rush hours due to the people's demand for personal vehicles. Additionally, when motorcycles and cars are gathered in one place too much, they will release toxic emissions such as carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, leading to global warming.
However, I believe there are other measures that are more effective. If the price of fuel keeps increasing, people will get angry and store the fuel. Therefore, the better solution is to use other energy sources, such as solar energy and electricity. These energy sources are not only reducing air pollution but also reducing ocean pollution caused by an oil leak from tankers. Another way that can help solve the environmental problems is sorting and recycling the waste. Every year, people release tons of garbage into the environment. There are many types of waste that need to sort with, such as organic waste, inorganic waste, and recyclable bottles. Aside from that, people can choose another way to destroy garbages. The usual solution that garbage companies regularly use is to grind the waste into small pieces and put them into an incinerator. These methods are harmful because they release toxic gases. Garbage like plastic bags takes a long time to decompose, so scientists have also found other solutions to deal with it, such as developing worms that only eat garbage, crushing garbage, and bringing it into blocks in order to replace bricks for building houses. In addition to raising people's awareness and finding solutions, the government can impose regulations on the amount of waste disposed of per day for decomposition companies and punish those who commit harmful acts to the environment.
In conclusion, increasing gasoline prices is not the best way to go. It is just one of the temporary solutions because there are many ways that are better. Solving environmental problems is not something that can be done by an individual but as a group task. The governments of every country need to propagate and educate their people to raise people's awareness and ensure that they do not cause further harm to the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football However others think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why is this the case How to solve this issue 73
- The graph below shows coffee production in four different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- The main aim of advertising is to increase the sales of products that people do not really need To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 476.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06932773109 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6584546948 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7701248963 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8076923077 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11538461538 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228393237225 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630197776524 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633754814429 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156205510891 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653898806217 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 476.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06932773109 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6584546948 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7701248963 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8076923077 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11538461538 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228393237225 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630197776524 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633754814429 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156205510891 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653898806217 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.