The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 to 2012

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 to 2012.

The line chart compares the incidence of crime in three different places in the New Port city center from 2003 to 2012.

Overall, it is noticeable that the number of incidents caused by robbers was the lowest in the period. Additionally, while the numbers of car thefts and robberies saw a slight rise, there was a significant decrease in the number of burglaries.

In terms of incidents caused by burglary, in 2003, the number of burglaries was the highest at nearly 3500 cases. In 2004, the number of burglaries reached a peak at 3750 before falling dramatically to 1250 cases in 2008. One year later, the number of burglaries increased moderately to nearly 1490 cases and remained constant at the same number of incidents at the end of the period.

As for the cases caused by car theft and robbery, in 2003, the number of robberies was the lowest at nearly 500 cases. After rising to 900 in 2005, the incidence of robbery has fluctuated between 500 and 1000 during the period. In contrast, the number of incidents caused by car theft remained stable at nearly 3000 incidents from 2003 to 2005. One year later, the number of car thefts experienced a slight fall to 2000 incidents before rising to 2750 cases at the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-14 Bao Chau Phan 61 view
2021-12-16 CDTSON 81 view
Essays by user CDTSON :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, as for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71100917431 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54067574601 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454128440367 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.7259696491 43.030603864 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113956156476 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737148977322 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178652543675 0.0843802449381 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163948126731 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.255521339998 0.0819641961636 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.