Many people nowadays argue that the most effective method to address the inherent environmental issues is to raise the cost of fossil fuels consumed by private cars and other means of transport. While this approach can directly reduce the number of harmful fumes, I believe that launching global awareness campaigns stands out as a more significant way.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that this radical climate policy might cut down on the poisonous emissions from private vehicles which pollute the environment. Indeed, as the cost per kilometer increases, citizens would have to contemplate the distance and frequency at which people travel on roads, as well as considering available options such as public transportation. If required to travel, commuters would opt to use the more environmentally friendly vehicles for instance buses, bullet trains, and subways. In both these cases, the total amount of noxious s fumes and polluted emissions that caused air pollution is limited and well controlled.
However, an increase in fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the complex environmental issues. In fact, causes of pollution are diverse and numerous, involving the use of plastic products, disposable goods in shopping, or chemical wastes, and contaminated sewage from agricultural and industrial activities. These pollutants pose a threat to the existence of various species, harm the environment, and disturb the ecosystem. For example, according to some researchers, half of China’s population cannot get access to the freshwater, and two-thirds of people residing in rural areas are consuming contaminated sources of water. Many affirm that untreated sewage and plastic products from industrialization are responsible for this reality. Therefore, the most drastic measure would be running a worldwide campaign that heightens consumer awareness about the environmental cost of their shopping habits and pressurizes companies to scale down the use of traditional fuels.
In conclusion, while increasing fuel costs can partly handle the environmental problems by discouraging private transport, the ideal solution would be raising awareness among the public and enterprises. I am also convinced that once more resolute measures are implemented, humans can reverse the repercussions of climate change and environmental issues.
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is increase the price of fuel To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some children spend hours everyday on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, third, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65722379603 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10343789856 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628895184136 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7929065462 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.642857143 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120892960309 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043158423194 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588550326427 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074676513492 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315486453567 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.