Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction
For many generations humanity has searched the opportunity to fulfill their talents which would be appreciated. In modern society, people still argue that the good wealth is much more significant than performing dreams and self-realisation. I completely disagree with this opinion and think that the well-off life is important, but most vital is to enjoy the avocation.
To my mind, the employees enjoying work bring more value to the company which they work in. Researchers say that when the job satisfaction is obtained, labor productivity rises, which has a beneficial effect on human’s development. Proved that a person, seeing the result of their work, performs tasks better, faster and more creatively. For example, “Apple” company’s policy is based on the fact that each employee can see that their work is visible and appreciated, which leads to the growing of the company. Thus, if humans are happy of their job, they help to progress.
More over, on my opinion, that people who work just for money, and who do not enjoy what they do become unhappy. The person can not work under constant stress, and if they can not see the positive outcome. This can lead to deep stress and depression. For instance, if the persons working in a company, where their boss never happy with their performance, and colleagues are waiting for an opportunity to betray them, those persons will resign, no matter how good money is. Simply because their emotional health is more important. In other words, the part of creating a happy society is that people should enjoy the results of their work.
To conclude, I am deeply convinced that the job gratification is more substantial, than the high income, because it brings persons happiness and makes them productive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-27 | bassmodulators123 | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | TLan168 | 11 | view |
- Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in a wider variety of methods our communication and social abilities have taken a step back Why does technological advance hurt nontechnical co 89
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society.Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion 89
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives What kind of problems can this cause What solutions can you suggest Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 95
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
For many generations humanity has searched the opportunity t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16494845361 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87423715776 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604810996564 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8102552866 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123811068315 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461996322057 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533635343164 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907599546792 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408363384221 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.