Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about the effects of these crops on our health and on environment. Inferring with nature in this way should be prohibited. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Biotechnology has two sides of influences onto crops (genetically modified ones), which can be able to maintain one’s healthy diet program by absorbing various nutritional values from it, whereas this side effect is unknown and it can be fatal to the health. In my perspective, while I understand the fatal potential risk for consuming GM crops, the benefits from such crops cannot be ignored. Therefore, the wise consumption should be recommended.
To begin with, the GM produces future opportunities to grow. The use of biotechnology makes the foods to be available throughout the year by efficient land usage, regardless with the climate unsustainable due to the global warming. Therefore, people can enjoy from constant healthy diet all year round by foods being available during unconventional growing seasons.
Since GM foods have maximised all the benefits (enhance the nutritional values), people could obtain more valuable and rich substances of nutrients from food so that they can manage their eating habit. Improved the quality of GM food will lead a less eating habit due to the sustain satiation. Thus, it can put a halt in the world hunger issue.
In contrast, the GM crops which influence on human’s health are leading to fatal maladies because inclusive of chemical substances within, thus some experts claim that such crops should be banned. The accumulation of such unknown chemical substances within one’s body is unknown but the past studies have discovered that it led to several chronic, respiratory and cell destructions. For example, the National Centre for Health Statistics stated that, the percentage of Americans with chronic illness jumped from 7% to 13% in just 9 years during the genetically modified crops being popular. Also, food allergies in children rose from 2.4% to 5.1% from 1997 to 2011. From this research, we can conclude that the genetically modified crops can directly effect on human’s health.
In conclusion, GM crops have several benefits related to growing and the nutritional value despite the critical health issues. Therefore, the amount of intake of GM crops should be monitored and watched closely to prevent any other potential health risks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-27 | Calvinthebeast | 89 | view |
| 2017-12-29 | jayjay | 61 | view |
| 2016-09-14 | hyangsu21@hanmail.net | 78 | view |
| 2016-09-14 | Monica1 | 78 | view |
| 2016-09-14 | Monica1 | 73 | view |
- The line graph shows total bonus payments from April to March by a private sector, financial year ending 2001 to financial year ending 2016 in the UK. 73
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- Nowadays people live in societies that consumer goods have become cheaper Do you think the advantages of consumer goods being cheaper outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 78
- Some people prefer to live in the same place most of their life, but others like to live in different places. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...od will lead a less eating habit due to the sustain satiation. Thus, it can put a halt in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 792, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...directly effect on human's health. In conclusion, GM crops have several ben...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.273399014778 0.247107183377 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.133004926108 0.155533422707 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100985221675 0.0946595960268 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0394088669951 0.0501214627716 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0221674876847 0.0437548338989 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12315270936 0.122226691241 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0467980295567 0.0403226058552 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84205875365 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0344827586207 0.0326793684256 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0788177339901 0.0861772015684 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0320197044335 0.021408717616 150% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00492610837438 0.011925033212 41% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2217.0 1933.35771543 115% => OK
No of words: 350.0 316.048096192 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.33428571429 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.408571428571 0.374742101984 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.314285714286 0.28420135186 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22 0.203846283523 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.148571428571 0.137316102897 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84205875365 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.037074148 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574285714286 0.56093040696 102% => OK
Word variations: 64.755770419 60.7387585426 107% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.875 20.7743622355 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.868582824 49.517814964 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5625 127.492653851 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7743622355 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.814263465372 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 53.3035714286 49.1944974215 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.27848101266 1.69124875643 135% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357722345491 0.332605444948 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11431392497 0.102741220458 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0547796614905 0.0668466124924 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.573450730226 0.534860350844 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149954770599 0.148594505496 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149636905644 0.134430193775 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068450440137 0.0742795772207 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.320989956972 0.324371583561 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0171030976723 0.0638462369009 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238869597529 0.228012699653 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526781224984 0.058150111329 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.4468937876 57% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.