Blood sports have become a hot topic for debate in recent years. As society develops it is increasingly seen as an uncivilized activity and cruel to the helpless animals that are killed. All blood sports should be banned.
Today, the modern society is less tolerant with blood sports. Most modern people argued that this recreational activity is archaic and inhumane, and therefore it should be prohibited. As an animal lover, I outline and endorse this viewpoint because there are others ways in which spend our leisure time and have fun.
First, sacrifice animals for entertainment is an activity that belongs to the last century, where most people did not have education, and their sympathize for other living things was zero. Nowadays, we live in world where all species should have the same rights to live, and their lives can be taken for humans with the only purpose for food or to make medical research to prevent diseases. This premise is followed by Spain. This European country, for years known as the land of bull fights, recently has forbidden by law this cruel festivity, and is allocating more funds in promoting its arts, cuisine and literature as a way to erase this shame past of its history.
Undoubtedly, society armed with these powerful arguments must persuade their parliaments to legislate in support of a law that make illegal this antiquated pastime. In addiction, governments, working hand in hand with the community, must encourage the practice of others activities that help people to cultivate their minds and souls, such as music, arts and the like.
In conclusion, our modern society under any circumstances should not longer tolerate this wrongly called "sports". Animals are living creatures as humans are, who can feel sad and happiness, and have the right to be treated with respect. Moreover, we are civilized creatures, who are capable to distinguish between bad and good, so there is no argument whatsoever to continue to doing so anymore when there are hundreds of other inofensive activities people can fall in love with.
- Should teenagers in high school work part-time? Give reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Young people today are better qualified than they were in the past Some people argue that this is because competition for jobs is greater than it used to be Others say that people only continue their education because the opportunities exist for them to d 76
- Young people today are better qualified than they were in the past Some people argue that this is because competition for jobs is greater than it used to be Others say that people only continue their education because the opportunities exist for them to d 58
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 73
- Education is not a luxury, but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone irrespective of personal wealth.Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to distinguish between bad and good, so there is no argument whatsoever to conti...
^^
Line 7, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctivities people can fall in love with.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, therefore, as for, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14191419142 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7312060601 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620462046205 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4047842569 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177771252986 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626254175499 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389496282048 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101342312687 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467743237358 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.