Bosses are paid higher than employees. Some people say that this is necessary, others claim that it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
In many organizations, the higher level of hierarchy people gets, the more they are paid. And while some people find the notion essential, others, however, oppose it. In my opinion, I support this policy as the higher salaries that bosses earn come with more responsibilities and dedication to work.
The main disadvantage of paying managers and high-status staff more than other employees is dissatisfaction among the workforce, which later might lead to lower productivity. From the perspective of some workers, due to the fact that both employers' and employees’ working hours are similar to each other and each position has its own hardship, they should not have a difference in their income. Therefore, if the organization pay the bosses more, the objection could arise among the bosses’ subordinates, causing worse performance and even lower loyalty as the workers feel that they are not being appreciated for all the contribution that they have done to the company. And this is true in authoritarian cultures like Vietnam where in some private companies, the managers are actually younger and have fewer years of experience when compares with their staff, therefore, dissatisfaction could happen among the workforce.
However, despite some protests, I still agree with the higher wages that bosses get as higher positions attach to more responsibilities, more tasks and of course, more skills. As people climb up the career ladder, their jobs would become more demanding to complete, let alone to finish them excellently. Moreover, the manager position also requires people who take it to master many soft skills like communication skill, problem-solving skill and time management skill, which few people can acquire. As a result, higher pay is totally reasonable for all the effort that they have put into their job. For instance, Facebook, a world-famous company, offers an astronomically high salary for important positions in the managerial apparatus, however, most of Facebook’s senior managers do not have time for their families and friends and their days are surrounded by the firm’s tasks.
In summary, people hold mixed views about whether or not companies should pay bosses more. In my point of view, although there might be objections among employees, higher levels of wages are still needed to reward bosses due to their dedication and hard work.
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 61
- The diagram shows a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- the table shows the information of total health expenditure per capita in five countries in 2019 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... summary, people hold mixed views about whether or not companies should pay bosses more. In my...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in summary, of course, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34308510638 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94354103932 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587765957447 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7227616757 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188766540808 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712399930471 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390391933971 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129542806345 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442861388691 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.