Both the poor and the rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree?
Higher education is a dream of every student nowadays. All the students regardless of their social class want to get admission into universities. It is disagreed that it is equally challenging for both the rich and the poor to gain access to higher studies. To support this point, use of money, power and social stature by the rich shall be discussed in this essay.
The kids of financially well-off families tend to buy their way into universities using money as donations. One such example was reported in 2006 by a journalist, of Jared Kushner, Donald Trump's son-in-law who got admission into Harvard University after his father made 2.5 million dollars donation to the university, despite his less than stellar high school grades. This is just one of hundreds such cases where millionaires paid donations to get their kids an admission slot that otherwise would have gone to some poor kid with better grades and intellect. This proves our stance that money does play a part in easing rich students' path to prestigious institutes.
Similarly, use of social and political influence for the same purpose has also been seen throughout the world. Admission of Maryam Nawaz daughter of Nawaz Shareef into King Edward Medical University, one of the most prestigious institute, in 1989 when her father was Prime minister of Pakistan, even when her marks were below that of an average student, presents the perfect example of such inappropriate use of power. Many other similar instances can be seen all around the globe. This demonstrates how corruption and insensible use of power plunders the poor of their right and damages the meritocracy. Resultantly, this makes it even harder for the poor to dream of getting into university for higher education.
All in all, this clears the fact that students belonging to elite and upper class of society do have an easier access to universities than their more talented and industrious lower and middle class counterparts. In my view, measures should be taken by universities' administrations to shun their donation policies that although are not illegal, but are immoral. Governments should introduce laws ensuring that merit prevails and admissions are not affected by someone's political or social capital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | viraj.mota51 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | nikaumarova | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | nikaumarova | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | ajayjain831 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | dacosta | 73 | view |
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today. What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? 84
- Both the poor and the rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today.What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? 73
- Both the poor and the rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today.What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...t money does play a part in easing rich students path to prestigious institutes. Simi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, similarly, so, well, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78581491286 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592896174863 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1348631022 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.1875 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165508387409 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551857127139 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672692726072 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103700282748 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393515697313 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.