In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care. Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
The concept of nursing homes is very prevalent in modern society. In Britain, many aged people live in there where they are looked after by nurses, and sometimes, the government has to pay for this care. However, some people argue that expenses should be covered by the family. My essay is going to discuss both views of this controversial issue.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that parents who play the most important and strong part in a child’s life provide them support financially and always try their best to bestow their child the ideal life they could imagine. Thus, definitely, children should take the filial responsibility for caring for their elderly parents, as well as their parents, did in their childhood. Furthermore, only after the family pays for the care do they spend time to visit their parents frequently to see whether they are receiving good healthcare and of course, it would be a great opportunity for the old to meet all family members and share the love. In addition, it contributes to curbing the tremendous financial burden on the government so that the government can handle other necessary matters.
However, firstly, all families are not the same due to the fact that not all aged people have children or relatives. They are lonely, helpless old people who can only subsist on the governmental succour. Secondly, even if they have family, their family may be still faced with financial problems and temporarily can’t afford their healthcare cost. Moreover, authorities levied taxes on the people’s earning during their work-life so that is the reason why the government should have a fixed fund for nursing homes. Let’s take the United State as a telling example. Only by collecting monthly premium from citizens do the US government easily support their needs when they become old and sick.
In conclusion, in view of above mentioned, it seems to me that both the families and the government, respectively, should go hand in hand to enable the elderly to be cared for in the best condition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-10 | rajpatel90 | 56 | view |
- 8 2 2020 The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many people often put their personal and private information online credit card number address for banking shopping Do you think it is positive or negative development 61
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Who do you think should pay for this care the government or the family 84
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sho 84
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98538011696 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64915023933 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576023391813 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3662829858 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378206787217 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115379861784 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106979995781 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224908340921 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891426567173 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.