The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The pie charts illustrate information about the main reasons for using phones of teenagers in one African country from 2016 to 2019.
Overall, it is clear that there were some significant differences in the answers. While most young people use social networks, the percentage of teenagers having phones just for calls was negligible.
Specifically, in 2016, 50% of the answers were social networks whereas only 10% of teenagers chose phone calls for the main reason. As might be predicted, the proportion of social networks fluctuated insignificantly between 48% (2017) and 51% (2018) before going to the highest point of 56% in 2019. Likewise, after increasing to 13% in 2017, the percentage of choosing phone calls declined to 11% in 2018 and finally hit a low of 5% in the last year.
Interestingly, email and digital camera were two answers which had the negligible disparities over time. The proportion of digital camera was 15% in 2016, followed by a continual increase to 20%. In contrast, email saw a slight decrease from 25% to about 19% in 2019.
Comments
The pie chart illustrates…
The pie chart illustrates the surveys of youth people in African country about the major purpose of using mobile phones from 2016 to 2019.
As can be seen from the graph, it is clearly evidence that over the time frame, four of sectors witnesses significant changes in their proportion of phone utilizations.
The socical networks sector accounted for the majority of using phonge in 2016 , equivalent to a half of the toal tal, however, this percentage had slightly decreased in 2017 but it prompt increased to 56% in 2019. During the same four-year period, due to the boom of social networks, the using phone calls as communication way went drop from 10% to 5%.
In 2016, purposing of using their phone for email represented an impressive 25% of the aggregate objection. However, by 2019, the figure had fallen considerably to 19%. An interesting side not is that, using their phone by African tennagers to take a photos eventually stable for two year, 2016 and 2017, which minor rose to 20% in 2019.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to phone'
Suggestion: to phone
...rks whereas only 10% of teenagers chose phone calls for the main reason. As might be ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to phone'
Suggestion: to phone
...13% in 2017, the percentage of choosing phone calls declined to 11% in 2018 and final...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, likewise, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99431818182 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82110712361 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7848250367 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23466394721 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940252353415 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134848394588 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17029084615 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161666779122 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.