Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.
Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that online shopping become more popular and convenient in modern society. So much more people prefer to shop through the internet nowadays. Personally I think disadvantages outweigh the advantages of it, while there are both positive and negative aspects on it.
Let me talk about positive aspects of internet shopping first. It is convenient that we can shop wherever and whatever we want irrespective of the time and place through the computer or mobile phone. It is good option for busy life people. Also we can order some out of stock items which are not in the shop. It makes us can save our time. And even they delivered it to your home around appointed time. In these days, service is focused on customers so you can handle it flexible fit in your time.
On the other hand, there are also some drawbacks of online shopping. First, we can't check the item in real. You can only choose through the picture that uploaded on the internet. It means you can't check the actual condition of the item. It can lead another problem as well. If you want to refund or exchange item, it take more time than you shop in person. You have to wait more because of the stages of it.
There are some convenient and inconvenient sides of internet shopping as we see. I would like to argue that it depends on your preference of style of shopping. I like to check the items in real and get the things directly than waiting in my home. So it seems drawbacks outweigh positive things for me.
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 56
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...It is good option for busy life people. Also we can order some out of stock items wh...
^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...drawbacks of online shopping. First, we cant check the item in real. You can only ch...
^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... uploaded on the internet. It means you cant check the actual condition of the item....
^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...you want to refund or exchange item, it take more time than you shop in person. You ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, well, while, i think, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51851851852 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3613137168 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540740740741 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8614834557 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 58.0952380952 106.682146367 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8571428571 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17384465801 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513245922042 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617674938159 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126636704808 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935801125341 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.3 13.0946893788 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 50.2224549098 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.05 12.4159519038 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.