Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now ‘one big traffic jam. How true do you think this statement is? What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
The last decade has witnessed myriad advancements in lifestyle and transportation. It is often reported that the amount of people who have their private cars has a strong rose, especially during the last 30 year period and this causes the traffic jams for many big cities where they have a large population. This essay will consider this issue and outline possible ways for governments to prevent citizens from using their own cars.
There is no denying that the problems caused by the increase of car ownership may lead to myriad defects. Firstly, the worth mention is traffic congestion, which may cause citizens to be late for work or school and also painful accidents happen since there is an overwhelming quantity of cars on the roads. Secondly, cities have to face air pollution from car fumes when they are moving on the roads. The more private cars, the more polluted air in our atmosphere.
To begin with, the jam traffic jams in big cities where have the array of cars cannot be avoided but we can reduce this problem by adding a fee when people enter the city center at peak hours. That is to say, people should use their motorbike or public transportation to reduce that fee. Thanks to this cure, we can reduce traffic jams during rush hour and the rate of accidents on the street.
The subsequent measure is that public transportation routes are escalated in order that people can easily travel to where they want. In other words, the limitations of destinations make them confused when using buses or trains to travel. This measure can completely encourage people to cut down the car used and tend to use this financial transportation to minimize transport fees.
In conclusion, the problem resulting from the increasing number of car ownership seems inevitable in today’s society; however, they could be mitigated by various solutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'traveling', 'travelling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: traveling; travelling
...hem confused when using buses or trains to travel. This measure can completely encourage ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95846645367 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62837374801 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568690095847 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1266747118 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308719194557 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972667355593 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626729440866 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16047873116 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436169091842 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.