Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society. Because of this, all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents.
It is true that the vital role of education requires that parents take a course for preparing them to be good parents. There are good arguments both for and against this view, but I believe it depends on different reasons.
I completely agree with the idea that educating and upbringing a child is the most significant task in any community. The first prominent justification is that stage of infancy is influenced dramatically by parents which means that the more education they receive in this stage, the more they become good citizens. Furthermore, only when individuals get right upbringing from their parents, will society decrease the crime rates since if today’s society had received appropriate education, we would not have had as many offenders as these days. In addition, a course that helps young parents to care for their children is necessary as some young parents do not have enough knowledge and experience for raising a baby. For example, the website “Care for the family” designed a stretch of positive courses with the purpose of training parental skills.
However, I believe that it is not essential for governments to intervene in holding compulsory parenting courses. Firstly, albeit our previous generations do not attend those classes, our society still develops progressively. Secondly, regardless of the benefits from parenting courses, it will take a lot of time and effort for governments to administrate and operate those courses while we can use this budget for other urgent matter. Finally, it is difficult for parents to devote their time to participate in those classes owing to the fact that they often work full-time. For instance, statistics showed that working parents occupied the most part of society.
In conclusion, while reasons can be given to justify that caring for children requires parents to enrol in parenting classes, I believe this is not an accurate statement under any circumstances.
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems? 84
- With the development of online communication, people will never be alone and will always be able to make new friends. To what extent do you agree? 67
- The tables give information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight in two particular cities in the same week in May 2007. 78
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28846153846 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88646664243 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1984447551 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.923076923 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242420420767 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932961291969 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925879223666 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182505749606 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088445429558 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.