Central and local government make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue. Some people think this money should be invested in social programs for the poor.
could be definitely believed that central and local governments have made a great deal of money via holding festivals. There are those who argue that this amount of money need saving up for the poor to lift them out of the current poverty. To my mind, governments should spend this sum of money on public health service and polluted environment because of the following reasonable arguments.
With the socio-economic development, there are varieties of serious diseases appearing and public health service need considering as one of the top priority concern. Governments should upgrade hospitals and invest more advanced technologies to meet requirements of diagnosis as well as having appropriate solutions to deter infective diseases from spreading over the whole community. What is more, there are also some other diseases that need concerning to have further researches to understand the roof of their symptoms and causes such as stroke, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Therefore, government should pay attention to short and long term courses for doctors and nurses to be well-trained to improve much more their professional skills. For example, Vietnamese government has saved a large amount of money for buying modern technologies to enhance the quality of public health car, so the government can handle well when diabetics happen to the communities.
Another reason is that governments also invest that money in reclamation of environmental pollution. To perform this responsibility, governments should invest in public means of transport to limit the least of the number of private vehicles appearing on the streets because the more cars we have, the more contaminated the environment will be. Therefore, it is essential for governments to have a national policy to encourage people to use more buses, metros and trains instead of using their cars. This will make a huge contribution to slump the emission of carbon dioxide and other pollutants to the air. This means that there will be a reduction of the risk of respiratory diseases for those who live in big cities and it also makes a great contribution to the decrease in climate change.
It seems to me that governments should consider spending that money on the best purposes to develop country stably. From perspective of public health service and contaminated environment, it is necessary to focus on the two issues. This is considered as a wise spending of many countries in the world including both less developed and developed nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Heyps | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | PennybooomC4 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | PennybooomC4 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | akbarf | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | akbarf | 61 | view |
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology 84
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years. 73
- Central and local government make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue. Some people think this money should be invested in social programs for the poor. 73
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the whole world and in different parts of the world 73
- The bar chart below shows the number of employees from the European Union in the United States (1999) 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Could
could be definitely believed that central and...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tics happen to the communities. Another reason is that governments also ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31920199501 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98918559181 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536159600998 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1133128998 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.3125 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0625 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245138801147 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080824867043 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449849581831 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15029623629 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614423142817 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.