Children can learn more efficiently by watching television. Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people can argued that watching television can be effective way to teach children. To my way of thinking, there are some positive and negative reasons to develop your child by TV program. I also believe that there are a little effect to know something new.
Usually, in television parents can find some interesting programs for their kids to add to knowledge. What is more, in some schools, teachers show TV channels such as History Channel, BBC or National Geographic Channel and it is also have a good influence on developing your child.
Nevertheless, there are much more negative of watching TV shows. Frequently, parents encourage children by allowing spend time to watch TV. It is not terrible, however they do not notice how many time their kids waste every day by television and it is also have a negative effect on children developing. It is fact that, just a little part of students watch about science or something useful for their develop on TV. Nevertheless, other part, waste a lot of time by useful shows. What is more, a huge number of kids prefer to watch movie instead playing outside with other it is also influence on their communication. In addition, they do not move as much as they have to therefore they have obesity problem.
In conclusion, I would like to say that it is clearly seen that we have to limit consumption of watching TV. What is more, we have to develop our mind by other kinds of develop. Nevertheless, sometimes we should encourage our children and give them what they want even if it is television.
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money 61
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888 By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use To what ex 84
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ional Geographic Channel and it is also have a good influence on developing your chi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... every day by television and it is also have a negative effect on children developin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'influenced'.
Suggestion: influenced
...d playing outside with other it is also influence on their communication. In addition, th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74444444444 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71145767872 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2595323312 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203972378345 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753622176298 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730448703463 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121531444084 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428735094513 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.