Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Children can learn more efficiently by watching television. Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people can agree that watching television could be effective way to teach children in school and at home. However, I partly share this opinion because I believe that TV can benefit to the learning process, but it also has a variety of negative impacts on children.
It is undeniable that teachers and parents can find some interesting and educational programs for kids on television, which help to develop their imagination and improve their memory. Watching programs such as History Channel, BBC or National Geographic Channel is a nice extra-curriculum activity for children to study and relax. In addition, while children spend their time with TV programs parents can do their chores such as cleaning, washing, paying their bills, talking on phone or just having a rest.
From the other side, there are much more reasons not to allow your child to watch TV. It has a bad impact on children`s health. Spending a lot of time sitting at a TV-set influences on eyesight and weight. Therefore, there is a problem of obesity, as they do not move as much as they have to. What is more, a huge number of kids prefer to watch movies instead of playing outside with other children, which also influences on their communication. Moreover, not all programs presented on TV are suitable for children and bring more entertaining content than educational.
In conclusion, educational TV programs should be carefully picked and time of watching should be limited by both, parents and teachers. Therefore, in my opinion, we cannot absolutely disallow watching television because of its educational importance although watching TV has significant negative influences on children.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-30 Rereirf 73 view
2020-10-30 Rereirf 61 view
2020-10-30 Rereirf 61 view
2020-10-28 Rereirf 56 view
Essays by user Rereirf :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entertaining content than educational. In conclusion, educational TV programs s...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9369086683 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591911764706 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5161299012 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.307692308 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335592006497 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116731396007 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942487310913 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214680680619 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875887416807 0.056905535591 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.