Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Children can learn more efficiently by watching television. Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people can argue that watching television could be effective way to teach children. Nevertheless, the other part of people absolutely disagree with this statement. In our century, we are not focus just on TV. There are some positive and negative reasons to develop your child by TV program. I partly agree with people who think that it is not the best way spend time by watching TV program. However, I believe that watching television could have a good effect on develop your child.
Usually, in television parents can find some interesting and educational programs for their kids. In addition, while children spend their time with TV programs parents can do their domestics plans such as cleaning, washing, paying their bills, talking on phone or just take a rest. What is more, in some schools, teachers show TV channels such as History Channel, BBC or National Geographic Channel and it is also have a good influence on developing your child. Actually, you can talk with them about program what they have watched. This is a good exercise to train your child’s memory.
Nevertheless, there are much more reasons do not allow your child watch TV programs. Frequently, parents encourage children by allowing spend time to watch TV. It is not terrible, however they do not notice how many time wastes every day and what actually watch their. It is also have a negative effect on children developing. Kids do not pay attention on environmental they just want watch harmful TV programs. In addition, it have a good impact on your child’s health. Spending a lot of time on television influence on vision, weight they do not move as much as they have to therefore they have an obesity problem and bed thinking. What is more, a huge number of kids prefer to watch movie instead playing outside with other it is also influence on their communication.
In conclusion, I would like to say that it is also clearly seen that we cannot absolutely disallow watching television. Furthermore, sometimes, you can encourage your child and allow them watch TV. Nevertheless, it should be educational and developing programs. Moreover, you have always look after them and limit-watching time.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-30 Rereirf 73 view
2020-10-30 Rereirf 61 view
2020-10-30 Rereirf 61 view
2020-10-28 Rereirf 56 view
Essays by user Rereirf :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 415, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ional Geographic Channel and it is also have a good influence on developing your chi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...d what actually watch their. It is also have a negative effect on children developin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...ch harmful TV programs. In addition, it have a good impact on your child’s health. S...
^^^^
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'influenced'.
Suggestion: influenced
...d playing outside with other it is also influence on their communication. In conclusion,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'looked'.
Suggestion: looked
...ing programs. Moreover, you have always look after them and limit-watching time.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, however, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9781420765 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74971461333 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489071038251 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6874520944 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2173913043 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9130434783 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04347826087 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241036606758 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782350376507 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589463641494 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160332162604 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356209000679 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.