Children nowadays watch TV programmes more than ever before. Is watching television good or bad for children?
In light of the proliferation of television programmes, the amount of time children consume on television tends to be higher than ever before. Despite several insignificant drawbacks, I am of the opinion that they are outweighed by television’s indispensable benefits.
There are several drawbacks when children are addicted to television for a long time. Firstly, the more time children spend lying down in front of the television’s scene, the worse their educational achievements are, which is explained by their neglected minds and lack of concentration on their courses at school. Furthermore, children fail to strike a balance between the time they spend watching television and doing exercises, leading to an increased incidence of several diseases at a young age, such as obesity and diabetes.
Beside the previously mentioned disadvantages, the benefits that TV programmes bring to children are more significant. First and foremost, the updated and sufficient knowledge of various fields, from science to literature, helps them nurture their creativity, and boost their aspirations in certain careers, which is an orientation for professional prospects in the future. Additionally, the entertainment programmes on television offer children leisure time after hardly studying hours, resulting in releasing their stress and preventing some mental disorders. Due to that, children are able to concentrate on their courses and attain better academic results.
In conclusion, while the drawbacks of this problem for their well-being and educational achievements are undeniable, I maintain that children benefit from the abundant storage of information through TV programmes and the funny leisure time in their spare time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | viviannguyen | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of female students on four different course at one university from 1970 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 84
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organisations 73
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 72
- Human activities have negative effects on plants and animals species Some people think it is too late to do a anything about this problem Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give our opinion 61
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7734375 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22767837847 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2819395973 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.8 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284119689825 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120452408401 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637031664184 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167688879347 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307121497311 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.