The chart below shows the number and purposes of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007
Details regarding the quantity and reasons why men and women made trips in a specific nation in Europe are depicted in the graphic.
It is noticeable from the chart that traveling to work was the most popular reason for trips for men, while women mainly made trips for shopping. The opposite trends were seen in day trip figures.
In 2007, the number of men traveling to work was highest, reaching appropriately 325 million, while the figure for women was significantly lower, at nearly 200 million. Shopping and visiting friends were the second most popular purposes of trips made by men, with fewer than 200 million people throughout the period shown. Meanwhile, around 280 and 200 million females went shopping and visited friends, respectively.
The same pattern can be seen for the number of men and women who made trips for sports or entertainment, at nearly 140 million people, compared to under 40 million males or females who chose day trips.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-28 | viviannguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | Cuberates | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | Bhoopal Reddy | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | Sai tharun | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | baljit12 | 73 | view |
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 61
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 72
- The chart below shows the number and purposes of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 78
- More and more measures to improve the security in large urban areas have been introduced in many countries because of the increased crime Do the benefits of these measure outweigh the drawbacks 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98125 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51774173368 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9653818273 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254103313309 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117945526056 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625506724643 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163552405996 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216823654627 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.