Children today are dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and joining in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors do you agree or disagree with this view

It is widely believed that nowadays children spend a lot of time on technology, while it would be not beneficial for children. Personally, I completely agree with this view that children must play sports and games for a variety of reasons.

First of all, there could be a negative problem when children are dependent on computers and electronic entertainment. This means that children keep away from their studies. In fact, they spend their leisure time playing games also means they distract from their goals. For example, when children stay with technology, they can cope with health problems such as obesity and weaker eyes. Furthermore, they have to wear glasses and avoid taking part in curriculum activities and basic conversations.

Secondly, if children are playing sports or doing outdoor activities without electronic entertainment, there are many benefits to them. This is because they can fit physically as well as mentally and also improve their cognitive skills. In fact, science has proved that children who take part in pixel games can not have various advantages over others who spend their time playing outdoor activities. In school, children should be taught lack of exercise could cause some diseases like diabetes and high blood pressure then they will prone to join physical activities to stay healthy. As a result, children will spend more time on outdoor activities to prevent illness.

In conclusion, I believe that encouraging children to take part in physical activities is indispensable and it will play a significant role in staying healthy children and avoiding some drawbacks that harm children's health. In my opinion, parents should be responsible for their children and encourage them to take part in sports instead of playing games on mobile.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28873239437 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74551265055 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552816901408 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9990044678 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.285714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0714285714 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274454224468 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108448683599 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727964521975 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191806410467 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060608842971 0.056905535591 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.