The children who grow up in a family short of money are more capable of dealing with problems in adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
people have different views about whether or not money is essential to bring up a child to become an ideal person. Although some people argued that wealthy parents raise their children better than poor parents, i personally believe that child from a poor family background is more prepared to handle the problems of real life.
On the one hand, children from poor families are less likely to maximise their education. one reason is that a part of their parents are unwilling to select a prestigious school for them, as tuition fees can take up a large proportion of family's income. Another reason is that education, in general, requires devoted a huge amount of time and energy, whereas many children have to work from an early age in order to support their family. Moreover, because of their poor educational background, children do not have specialised knowledge in solving problems which required in a specific area of work. As a result, they would encounter severe disadvantages when participate in practical working environment.
However, children from poor families tend to have more freedom and independence than their counterparts. Due to limited family finance, poor children may learn the way to work harder towards achieving their goals than those with abundant money. this element is important to deal with issues later in life. For instance, some children now are still selling lottery tickets or brushing others’ shoes in big cities to earn money buying food they want. Furthermore, children whose family does not have large amounts of money may become more prudent with money as well as understand the value of money. this aids them in handling crisis situations involving money in the future.
In conclusion, children with less money usually grow up becoming more independent, responsible, creative and happier individuals.
- Do you think it is better to send criminals to jal or let them receive education or job training? 61
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 93
- The children who grow up in a family short of money are more capable of dealing with problems in adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
people have different views about whether or n...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
people have different views about whether or not money is essential to bring up a child ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...ess likely to maximise their education. one reason is that a part of their parents ...
^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires devoted" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'devoting' or 'to be devoted'.
Suggestion: devoting; to be devoted
...is that education, in general, requires devoted a huge amount of time and energy, where...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...r goals than those with abundant money. this element is important to deal with issue...
^^^^
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... well as understand the value of money. this aids them in handling crisis situations...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in general, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24242424242 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69921973255 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7723896173 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.214285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282086573736 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100059597504 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610695292294 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18628423502 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04886202212 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.