A common opinion is that art experts are paid considerably low and an appropriate solution might be acquiring salary from the authorities. I support this view to some extent and the details about government funding will be given throughout the essay.
Firstly, there is no doubt that artists are known to create extraordinary works and have a massive influence on society. Despite the tremendous effort, priceless creations they make are underestimated and not highly valued. A good illustration of this occasion is Van Gogh who never managed to sell a painting to maintain his living standards. Secondly, the declining trend to become an artist as a profession may oppose a crucial threat for future generations since art is eye-opening and satisfactory. In other words, pieces of art have the ability to unite people across a spectrum of humanity. There is no doubt that art can be significantly effective to raise awareness and increase the sensitivity towards nature and relationships that individuals have. Therefore, in order to develop and live in prosperity, composers and designers should be encouraged and appreciated. Whether the painter is from a privileged or deprived background, the government ought to motivate the fine art produced due to a number of merits.
Consequently, the contribution of governments to art would be extremely advantageous in terms of attracting tourists. Supporting artists and the movements may facilitate economic growth alongside international recognition. Similarly, art can lead to a set of liberating ideas as well as a sense of belonging. Additionally, with the help of funding painters can have a wide range of opportunities to master their occupation and improve their ability to create.
In conclusion, art strengthens social relationships and culture, thus supporting artists would increase their contribution to humanity. Governments’ financial support can help experts to pursue their careers much more successfully which will eventually make a significant difference in society.
A common opinion is that art experts are paid considerably low and an appropriate solution might be acquiring salary from the authorities. I support this view to some extent and the details about government funding will be given throughout the essay.
Firstly, there is no doubt that artists are known to create extraordinary works and have a massive influence on society. Despite the tremendous effort, priceless creations they make are underestimated and not highly valued. A good illustration of this occasion is Van Gogh who never managed to sell a painting to maintain his living standards. Secondly, the declining trend to become an artist as a profession may oppose a crucial threat for future generations since art is eye-opening and satisfactory. In other words, pieces of art have the ability to unite people across a spectrum of humanity. There is no doubt that art can be significantly effective to raise awareness and increase the sensitivity towards nature and relationships that individuals have. Therefore, in order to develop and live in prosperity, composers and designers should be encouraged and appreciated. Whether the painter is from a privileged or deprived background, the government ought to motivate the fine art produced due to a number of merits.
Consequently, the contribution of governments to art would be extremely advantageous in terms of attracting tourists. Supporting artists and the movements may facilitate economic growth alongside international recognition. Similarly, art can lead to a set of liberating ideas as well as a sense of belonging. Additionally, with the help of funding painters can have a wide range of opportunities to master their occupation and improve their ability to create.
In conclusion, art strengthens social relationships and culture, thus supporting artists would increase their contribution to humanity. Governments’ financial support can help experts to pursue their careers much more successfully which will eventually make a significant difference in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-29 | Elenochka315 | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Canada from 1984 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- A common opinion is that art experts are paid considerably low and an appropriate solution might be acquiring salary from the authorities I support this view to some extent and the details about government funding will be given throughout the essay Firstl 84
- Some people say that relationships should be based on honesty and trust Others believe that it is sometimes necessary to be dishonest in order to maintain harmony Which approach do you consider to be better in relations 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57692307692 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32239328992 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.7065391823 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.75 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371279373875 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110430668001 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175973655132 0.0667982634062 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300830096585 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.353533715639 0.056905535591 621% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.