companies should provide sports facilities for local communities. To what extend do you agree?
The provision of sports facilities for local communities by companies is a topic of debate. Some argue that companies should take on this responsibility to promote physical activity and community bonding, while others believe it should primarily be the government's role. This essay will discuss both viewpoints and provide a balanced analysis.
Those in favor of companies providing sports facilities argue that they possess the financial resources and capabilities to invest in such initiatives. By doing so, companies can contribute to the well-being of the community and encourage a healthy and active lifestyle. Accessible sports facilities can foster a sense of belonging and social interaction among community members, leading to a stronger and more cohesive society. Moreover, corporate involvement in promoting sports facilities demonstrates a commitment to corporate social responsibility, enhancing the company's reputation and building positive community relations.
On the other hand, opponents contend that the responsibility for providing sports facilities lies primarily with the government. They argue that relying solely on companies may result in uneven distribution, with certain areas benefiting more from corporate initiatives. Governments, with their authority and resources, are better positioned to develop comprehensive and sustainable sports infrastructure. By investing in government-funded sports facilities, equitable access can be ensured, focusing on underserved communities and promoting social inclusivity.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments for companies to provide sports facilities for local communities, the primary responsibility lies with the government. A collaborative approach, where companies partner with the government, can be a more effective solution. Companies can contribute their resources and expertise, working alongside the government to develop sports complexes. Simultaneously, the government should oversee accessibility, prioritize underserved communities, and ensure long-term maintenance. This partnership between the private and public sectors can create a healthier and more inclusive society, offering recreational opportunities to all community members.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Sandeep USA | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-03-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of living a number of different places during your childhood years 78
- some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities for example helping at home or at work Others believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy their lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 73
- Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own op 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...hers believe it should primarily be the governments role. This essay will discuss both view...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.41528239203 5.12529762239 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45255141266 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3725867826 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6875 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349580327243 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12353327742 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972076872796 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235445302283 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523311347539 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 10.91 50.2224549098 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.96 12.4159519038 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.