Computers are being used more and more in education and so there will soon be no role for the teacher in education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
On the leading edge, individuals are attempting to use technology, particularly computers, as much as possible in the field of education. Many people believe that the function of the instructor in the classroom is dwindling as the situation evolves. I completely agree with this viewpoint for a variety of reasons.
First and foremost, computers are now a type of resource that supplies a plethora of resources in a variety of fields. Students can use a laptop to access the Internet and explore any website to get instructions, information, and even lecture videos. It does not appear to be difficult for schoolchildren to absorb adequate knowledge in the absence of an instructor. Self-study students, for example, can be at home with their personal computers and learn arithmetic through mathematics programs or art by painting digital gadgets attacked by computers. Overall, computers, rather than instructors, are likely to serve as tutors, providing resources.
Second, students have greater flexibility in terms of where and when they want to learn, as opposed to the constancy of a classroom with teachers. Some personal computers are relatively portable and easy to carry, making them extremely useful for students to be successful in their studies.
However, not all student is conscious of their studies, and as a result, without professors reminding them, they get lazier and lazier. Despite having adequate technical gadgets to learn, students do not study. In this case, teachers who will directly advise children on how to learn efficiently are required.
To summarize, computers are playing an essential role in education and have the potential to replace teachers in classrooms. This situation may occur in the future; nonetheless, the involvement of instructors is crucial.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47142857143 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06730620365 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617857142857 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6764777784 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.133333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168358480685 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486594213841 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506427790705 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084304921363 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278861132094 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.