Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Analog is playing a vital role in the present decades, which is marked as an essential innovation. While some people are of the opinion that which is not crucial, I believe that it is a revolution in this century.

On the one hand, some people say that the CPU is not an influence engine because of some drawbacks which are present in that. Firstly, electronic waste, raising in an amount which is affecting the environment and living things. If it continues, future generations will get more harm. Even though the laptop is portable, it would not work without charge and this may cause disaster inconsequential events. Secondly, rockets and robotics we're developing in this same decade, which all are most likely doing a favour for world development and wealthiness. These were created less harm than Microsoft. Finally, many developments occurred in the agriculture field which is also an essential innovation for food production. At the same time, not everyone using the gadgets which were invented. In addition, mobile phone, motor vehicles, the electric machine much more were invented in the same decades. For example, In 2015, the New York Times conducted a survey among the public in America. In that two-third of the people refused that computer is not an ideal invention.

On the other hand, I believe that a computer is an important gadget from which we have invented in the past decades. This is because the world becoming digitalised in the ways of conducting smart class in schools, setting the GPS in vehicles, accessing the need things from the home through the networks, save more information in one gadget, communicating easily through miles and the more benefits are available. Another reason is we can save multiple different information in one appliance and we can take more backup and also through this we can prevent man-made errors and we can utilize less manpower and resources. For instance, In 2018 Cambridge University conducted a study among hospitals in London. In that they founded 94% among them were using the device to store the patient's data.

In conclusion, I agree that although there are some drawbacks with the electronic machine, there are many reasons to agree that the tool an important innovation.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 781, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...them were using the device to store the patients data. In conclusion, I agree that al...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06469002695 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71146704397 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8160314146 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8947368421 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0959368433881 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285630117762 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343507306962 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654903540203 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036170167375 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.