Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Is it a positive or negative development

These days, there is a striking similarity between many countries since they sell the same commodities. I believe this is a negative development, which is due to globalisation and the reduction in rates of travelling.

The reasons why nations have become similar are many and varied. First, the integration of different countries of the world had brought about economic migration. One reason for this is that most large-scale industries have relocated to countries that are beneficial to them economically. Such companies pay low taxes as well as have easy access to an adequate power supply and cheap labour. As a result of this, employers pay their local workers' low wages compared to their work input. The production and assembling of the well-known apple product in China are a good illustration of this. Also, owing to the cooperation and collaboration between developed and developing countries in reducing the import duties on the products typically purchased, similar goods are being sold everywhere in the world.

Furthermore, aside from the negative effect of globalisation, the travel and tourism industry is severely affected. An explanation for this is that people do not need to travel to invest in foreign commodities, as long as they can buy such goods without hassles in their native countries. Take high-priced goods such as Chanel and Louis Vuitton, for example, the world travellers typically go to Paris to purchase these luxury items. However, since natives can buy these items locally, travelling will almost always become unnecessary. Consequently, more established airlines are being forced to fold-up because there is a marked reduction in the number of tourists.

In conclusion, although it has become quite popular for an increasing number of countries to share similarities. It has brought about many problems for this to be considered a positive trend.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this, employers pay their local workers low wages compared to their work input. ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34899328859 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99529682535 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607382550336 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6247179591 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239355643232 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644466471145 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450925105773 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11872892242 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280941119084 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.