The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Nowadays, high increase in Carbon dioxide emission has been recorded in most of the countries. The above given line graph depicts the information about the average CO2 emitted per individual in the following regions: United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Each country shows different patterns of emission. CO2 emitted by person living in United Kingdom has reached 11 metric tonnes, which is highest when compared to other countries. But, there is stability in the rate for one year and after 1977, we can observe that the emission rate has fallen to 9 metric tonnes. Suddenly there’s a change in the rate of emission which drops drastically from 1987. When compared between the countries, emission from Portugal is minimal about 4.5 metric tonnes. The emission rate in Sweden has progressively increased during 1977 and was recorded as second highest country. Yet, it has steep decrease in the rate of emission since 1977 to 2007. At the initial stage, Italy has reached 6.5 which was second minimal country after Portugal. But, we can notice that, there a steep increase and decrease in the rate of emission between 1987-2007.
According to my observation, United Kingdom is the highest country and Portugal is the lowest country in emission of carbon dioxide per individual.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Each
...taly and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Each country shows different patterns of emi...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 937.175257732 117% => OK
No of words: 212.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19339622642 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57211319481 2.54303337028 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 127.690721649 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 290.88556701 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1782773668 44.8134815571 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 76.5299724578 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 4.34317383033 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.29896907216 47% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249666912158 0.216113520407 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948186525132 0.0766984524023 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765259100905 0.0603063233224 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194765412843 0.12726935374 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032744296058 0.0580467560999 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 8.37731958763 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 8.71597938144 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.