Countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development ?
In the era of ever-advancing technology, globalization has been more highly appreciated than ever before, making the idea of importing food from around the world prominent among a great deal of sellers and consumers. Although the idea appears to be remarkably profitable, there are a number of underlying downsides that must be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, importing food from other nations around the globe would be a beneficial development in a variety of aspects. First, this action would play a crucial role in enhancing consumers’ nutritional diet. More specifically, market-goers across the globe can have access to a wider range of fruits from other nations, thereby expanding their choice of products. This trend, as a result, would act as a remedy for those who struggle to cope with the cuisine of their home country.
On the other hand, the act of selling food from other regions would also bring about looming adversities to the country’s economy. By this, I mean in order to transport food from one place to another, a company is required to pay for shipping fee as well as the fee to keep the food at the desired temperature. As a result, consumers from foreign countries are then charged with a much higher cost compared to( in comparison with) the original price. Being left with two options, whether to buy a foreign product which costs much higher than it actually is or to buy local food that cost less and still tastes good, chances are that market-goers would show interest in the latter. Moreover, different nations nationwide pride themselves on their cultural cuisine, if the act of food-importing is promoted, chances are that countries would lose their sense of originality. This does not only undermine the nation’s core values but also appears as a threat to its tourism system.
In the light of the aforementioned discussion, much as I agree that food importing is totally beneficial in terms of consumers’ nutritional diet, I believe it can not outweigh the economic drawback as well as the demise of cultural individuality that are entitled to this movement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-01 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | Mollymaul | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-07 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | RkmsU | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-02 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- Discuss the pros and cons of learning online 73
- With the increasing use and development of new technology many machines are now able to do the work which people used to perform What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 80
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 61
- discuss the pros and cons of public transport 56
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal diet, I believe it can not outweigh the economic drawback as well as the dem...
^^
Line 9, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity that are entitled to this movement.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, i mean, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06267806268 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93227865849 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561253561254 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6558174438 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.692307692 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256124727697 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877742810731 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632255571191 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138812065657 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472136156405 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.