Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Logically, it is true that if people work more than the average workday, so more they contribute to the country's economy, compared to those who work less. However, this fact mismatch reality. Therefore, I certainly disagree that governments gain more taxes and increase the state's budget if only they extend the workday for its citizens.
First of all, a long working day is not enough if doesn't use effective management. Thus, increasing working time is not useful without the use of new technologies, process automation, and management strategies. To illustrate, take the economic level of North Korea. It is widely known that North Korea's population is considered the most working population on Earth, given that an average working day there lasts for 9 hours. However, we hardly can say that this country advanced economically.
Moreover, even working half a day some countries achieve high progress. Usage of the newest technologies, research, and development, and effective administration of the daily routines get some regions to the top in the worldwide economic ratings. For example, in Silicon Valley near the San-Francisco, forty percent of global wealth accumulates in this small area. While people here don't have even an office schedule. Despite their work whenever they want and how long they want the results of their job are hard to overestimate. As a result, we again see here that working duration has nothing in common with increasing some governments’ budgets or populations’ financial assets.
In conclusion, certainly, countries with longer average working terms are not specifically competitive economically, in contrast, countries with less than average working time can be high-level players. In other words, any country that aims to have a mature economical condition has to look for any solutions except adding working hours.
- The tables below provide information about the consumption and production of potatoes in five parts of the world in 2006 73
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight This is a serious problem for wealthy countries Discuss some causes and effects of this problem 78
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ll, a long working day is not enough if doesnt use effective management. Thus, increas...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd management strategies. To illustrate, take the economic level of North Korea. ...
^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountry advanced economically. Moreover, even working half a day some countries a...
^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... wealth accumulates in this small area. While people here dont have even an office sc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s in this small area. While people here dont have even an office schedule. Despite t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39175257732 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96249031827 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628865979381 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7087518177 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335081742754 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930612004413 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824925887632 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205977849256 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683542496516 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.