A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is often believed that whenever a country becomes more diversified with a myriad of cultures and religions, the rate of development increases significantly and also becomes more appealing to visitors. According to my perspective, a more diversified population of a particular country can have numerous merits and demerits as well. The following essay discusses both.
Throughout history, it was witnessed that most of the civil wars and conflicts arose due to discrimination done among religions or cultures. For instance, the middle-eastern portion of the Asian continent has neither been able to achieve peace nor development to date, due to the interest of various religions over the oil fields. There are many countries around the globe that are able to develop and nurture themselves without the involvement of any other religions like China, the Korean countries, and Japan. These countries are the live examples that are against, what is aforementioned in the statement.
As every paper has two sides to it, there are countries whose advancement was not going to happen if they had not supported a more diverse crowd. The countries like America, countries falling under the European continent, Australia, and India. Having a mixture of nationalities among its population can be immensely fruitful, as more the diversification more ideas and perspectives can be carved out of it. For instance, if we look upon some research team from some developed nation they are never of same nationality or religion. The diversification can even make a particular country more appealing to visitors and fun-seekers around the globe, which brings development from another perspective. A mixture of religion also leads to a ton of cultures that needs to be followed in a single country leading to more interesting lifestyle than just following predetermined rituals every coming year.
Weighing up both points of view, I partly agree with the statement that more diversification can only lead a country to become more interesting and developing. On the one hand, history and some countries proved that the lesser the diversification the better, but on the other hand, there are numerous examples of countries where their huge mixture of religion among the crowd is solely making them more interesting and developing nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-21 | grahamoneil | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | Sayansh Garg | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 73
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34332425068 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09283630216 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561307901907 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4864509152 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.733333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26942380676 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897958433115 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049701329698 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166105081922 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047871557294 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.