Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In our contemporary world, there are numerous wealthier nations who offer money to undeveloped nations in order to improve their financial condition, but eventually fail to do so. Instead, they should be providing other types of aid to nurture their financial situations. This is often discussed yet rarely understood. In my opinion, it is true that different types of aids must be provided in place of money if the target is to remove their poverty.
First of all, it is worth appreciating that these wealthier nations are even trying to help some poor countries in their growth. But providing only money in the name of aid in order to remove poverty is not enough somehow. For instance, it is more of like giving some amount to money in the hands of a teenager by his parents, who are just providing as he insists. This money would not be able to help him grow in life. On top of that, a huge amount of raw money supplied into the system of some poorer nations can also lurk corruption around.
There could be numerous other ways of providing help to poorer countries like providing free education all over the nation, investing in the local brands, setting up various new manufacturing plants etcetera. Good quality of education received by any nation clearly defines its bright and rich future. Wealthier nations can invest a lot in the local companies and the share market as well to nurture their economy. What is more, setting up huge production industries, which in turn can provide huge employment and better job prospects to the people of that nation. Last but not least, they can even tie up with the infrastructure firms to develop the nation further.
To reiterate, I completely agree with the idea of providing numerous different types of aid in order to improve the financial conditions of poorer nations, instead of just giving some money. It is often misunderstood that giving money not only cannot help in the removal of poverty but can also lurk illegal money laundering. Instead, help must be provided to the basics on which a country can grow on itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarket in some countries many small local business are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree or 89
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 67
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Write about the following topic Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relev 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...letely agree with the idea of providing numerous different types of aid in order to improve the fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, for instance, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, what is more, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82122905028 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6073948994 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513966480447 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2256491843 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.529411765 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0588235294 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22697797303 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731613336321 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509286300898 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153200642604 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727741170845 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.