A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is agrued that a nation becomes more attraction and develops more quickly when its individuals includes a diversity of nationalities. From my point of view, at some situation i mostly agree with this notion because of its benefits for their country development. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearence of modern technology that population life have been advanced graduately, so mixture of nationalities is hugely significant for the society. Not only does the foreign speaker improve the adolesence language abilities, advancing their potential life, but also the traditional knowledge, social experience and valuable information will be transmited by the individual which have a various of strength for their occupation. Furthermore, positive relationship with other nation can be created by appropriate diployacy. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by David Bob, the famous scientist and professor which was about the success of europian countries where have diversity of nationalities. The statistic showed that nearly every nation has got a plenty of achevement.
However, we can not negate the drawback of this problem for the society. Lacking of cutural may lead numerous unneccessary conflict and controversial of citizens and also socioeconomic will be wided by this phenomenon, reducing their economic background. Moreover, many government take advantage from aboad investment for their own revenue, harmful influence will be led by this action to the young generation.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay that i totally agree with this statement, but also have some nagative aspect for the individual. The state need to have clear plans to improve their populations for the nation development.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-10 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
2022-09-21 | grahamoneil | 78 | view |
2021-10-10 | Sayansh Garg | 84 | view |
2021-07-21 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
2021-07-20 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clothing Do you agree or disagree 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh disadvantages 89
- Reporting of crimes and other kinds of violent news on television and in newspapers can have adverse consquences This kind of information should be restricted from being shown in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activities Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the international world...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation has got a plenty of achevement. However, we can not negate the drawback ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y this action to the young generation. To conclude, by my agrument from the ess...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52898550725 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09919666265 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6732721433 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.384615385 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155809717089 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610550265862 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111691022373 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107324632411 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114697839207 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.