Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The issue of whether artists are allowed to freely voice their opinions through any piece of art or governments should put some curbs on their works of art has become controversial when it comes into discussion. I embrace the former idea and its reasons are explored below.
Firstly, freedom of opinion and expression is universally recognized as a fundamental civil right. Along with some others like the right to live and the right to learn, this right is, in fact, constitutionally stated and protected. Obviously, it is one of the manifestations of a democratic society and the result of the enduring efforts of human beings from the beginning of civilization through plenty of revolutions and violence, meaning many individuals did sacrifice their lives for the freedom of opinion and expression.
Secondly, the infringement from governments on artists’ freedom of speech is likely to cause two adverse impacts. One of them is that creativity will be deterred. It then results in the bounds of creativity, which makes artists fail to depict the multifaceted aspects of our life and to fulfill their roles. Another one is that government restrictions on art pieces can cause tension between authorities and artists; gradually, this may permeate society.
Last but not least, artists’ ideas conveyed in their pieces of art deliver constructive feedback to governments. Through their artwork, artists can evoke public attention to issues that they think they are essential to be aware of. Then governments can recognize what needs to be improved to meet public expectations. For instance, in recent years, many sarcastic pictures about corruption on Tuoi Tre Cuoi magazine has been succeeding to raise public consciousness and to call for Vietnam government to take action.
In conclusion, artists are constitutionally entitled to freely express their voice via any kinds of their artwork and this is an effective channel that governments can use to collect constructive criticism. Also, Legal sanctions do harm than good, thereby being unnecessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Shidbi | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | mone49 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Stephen Halolo | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
- Intelligent machines such as robots are widely applied to take the place of human beings. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages. 89
- Discuss the consequences of deforestation. 11
- What could be the consequences of deforestation? 89
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbing. What factors contribute to job satisfation? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
- Should we ban plastic bags? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Also, Legal sanctions do harm than good, thereby being unnecessary.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41975308642 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08915311065 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617283950617 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5801483086 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.066666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228298227039 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719362459913 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442525351844 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114777804843 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373037861022 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.