In modern world, technological advancements are growing rapidly and being used efficiently. This development is used in various forms, and used for the betterment of the society. Majority of the people often argue that the technological development can deduct the rate of crime. I agree to the statement that, the new innovations can control crimes, but I believe that it can also cause some consequences.
On the one hand, numerous updates in the science and engineering has countless benefits and also has potential to prevent all sorts of illegal actions. New developments like cc tv are being widely adopted in various sectors and in households, that can record any kind of activity, and also has an ability to store the recorded data. Moreover, the DNA procedure, currently being used by many investigation teams, to identify the any type of evidence that can be found in place where illegal action has taken place. This can present the proof meticulously.
On the other hand, notwithstanding the technology merits, there are some major setbacks in development of this new innovations. It is beneficial as well as hazardous, most of the issues by the technological advances are not disclosed properly, as a result the outdated technology in many places is causing the crimes. For instance, this up-to-date development not only advantageous to general users but also causing the online crimes. Most of the hackers are residing on this development and tending to cause more and more online crimes like, online scams, financial extortion and password trafficking.
In conclusion, the technology has the ability to detect and prevent multitude of crimes, but there are some parallel consequences to it, which are not negotiable and should be taken into consideration.
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things What is your opinion 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think the drivers should cover the costs Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The number of people interested in cosmetic surgery is increasing in order to improve their physical appearance Why do people do operations to change the way they look Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26056338028 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05608650877 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542253521127 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2149595392 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125024542023 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479341618782 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535484994742 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081737448758 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433472084494 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.