Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?
It is true that cycling is one of the most effective ways to reduce pollution. However, it is unpopular as other types of vehicles. There are a number of reasons behind this view and several solutions should be adopted to improve the situation.
To begin with, there are two main reasons why cycling is not as popular as other means of transport. One reason is the risk of road accidents in some countries. For instance, Vietnam is the nation where motorcycles accounted for the majority of private vehicles. However, there are no specific roads for each type of vehicle which could cause a high risk of injuries. Furthermore, the distance from places to places is often long which could be exhausting and time-consuming. Therefore, many people prefer other types of vehicles to bicycles.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to prevent this problem. The first solution would be the planning to build separate roads for each type of vehicles. The reason is that cyclists will have a safe way of cycling and do not worry about the risk of getting accidents. The second measure would be the planning of the authority for residential zones. This is a great way to reduce the distance as well as the exhaustion commuters have to bear when traveling. Therefore, those solutions are effective ways to tackle the problems.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for the unpopularity of bicycles and steps need to be taken to solve that problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Roy An | 95 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | Linh Nguyen Khanh | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jenny_6902 | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | hxyav | 61 | view |
- Space travel has been possible for sometime. Some people think that space tourism will probably be developed. What are the positive and negative about it?. 73
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- the chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ry about the risk of getting accidents. The second measure would be the planning of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91164658635 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71274364454 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522088353414 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2002155162 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4375 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0985849276343 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357851120931 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688938343642 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545268574883 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060896389274 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ry about the risk of getting accidents. The second measure would be the planning of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91164658635 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71274364454 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522088353414 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2002155162 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4375 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0985849276343 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357851120931 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688938343642 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545268574883 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060896389274 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.