Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?
It is true that nowadays although using bicycles is more eco-friendly to the environment than other means of transport such as cars, trucks, and motorbikes, it is still not popular in many countries around the world. This essay will examine the reasons behind this phenomenon and then offer some feasible solutions to it.
There are a number of factors responsible for why few people use bicycles to commute daily. Chief among these is that traveling to the office a long distance, using bicycles is very time-consuming which can affect work efficiency. The workers, for example, if they live far from their office, the time they commute from home to the office is very long. Therefore, they have to use cars or motorbikes to save time going to work. Another point worth mentioning is that traveling by bicycle is very dangerous because many cars and trucks are running on the street where the bikers travel together. This stems from the fact that there are not many roads bike for the bikers, as a consequence, they have to ride in the same lanes with the containers and trucks which results in many serious accidents.
Various measures, nevertheless, can be adopted to tackle the situation. The first possible approach is that the government should spend money on building roads bike and upgrading the facilities of the road. As a result, these activities can encourage people to use bicycles as their primary means of transport. The second solution is that the government should increase taxes on fossil fuels which can help to limit the use of private vehicles. This is because if the taxes increase, people will tend to use bicycles to go to work to save money on paying for fossil fuel.
In conclusion, several reasons can be given to explain why using bicycles is unpopular with many people around the world. However, steps can be taken to mitigate the situation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Roy An | 95 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | Linh Nguyen Khanh | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jenny_6902 | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | hxyav | 61 | view |
- It is sometimes said that countries should produce all the food for their populations to eat and import as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays many families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centres provide the best care Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 61
- Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both of these views and give 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n offer some feasible solutions to it. There are a number of factors responsibl...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich results in many serious accidents. Various measures, nevertheless, can be a...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... save money on paying for fossil fuel. In conclusion, several reasons can be gi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88993710692 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5634795023 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534591194969 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8419383189 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11295499686 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353431367131 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618809813134 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08212689242 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783315151171 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.